After 3+ years as a QA Analyst at a Fortune 500 company, I made the leap to full-stack development. Here's why, and why I don't regret keeping one foot in QA.
Most developers start by building things. I started by breaking them.
For over three years at Centene Corporation, my job was to find every crack, every edge case, every way an application could fail. I wrote test automation with Selenium and Playwright, designed test strategies for healthcare platforms where bugs could affect real people, and learned to think about software from the user's perspective first.
That experience shaped how I build software today in ways I didn't expect.
QA is rewarding, but I kept finding myself wanting to fix the bugs I found, not just report them. I'd file a detailed ticket with reproduction steps, screenshots, and a suggested fix, then watch it sit in the backlog.
Eventually, I started fixing things myself. Small PRs at first. A UI tweak here, a validation fix there. Then bigger features. And I realized: I wanted to build full-time.
Most developers handle the happy path and call it done. After years of QA, I instinctively think about: What happens when the input is empty? What about special characters? What if the API is slow? What if the user double-clicks?
I write tests because I've seen what happens when teams don't. Not just unit tests, but meaningful integration tests that catch real regressions. Every feature I ship has been stress-tested by someone who spent years breaking software professionally.
QA analysts are professional users. We use the software the way real people use it: clicking things in the wrong order, entering unexpected data, resizing windows to weird dimensions. That perspective makes me a better developer.
Writing clear bug reports taught me to communicate technical issues to non-technical stakeholders. That skill transfers directly to client communication, documentation, and code reviews.
I didn't abandon QA. I absorbed it. MaverickBytes offers both development and QA consulting because they're two sides of the same coin. The best code is code that's been built with testing in mind from day one.
When I build a feature, I'm simultaneously thinking about how to test it. When I write a test, I'm thinking about the architecture that makes it testable. The loop is tight, and the output is better software.
The transition from QA to development isn't a step sideways. It's a level-up. You're not starting over. You're bringing a rare skill set to a new role.
Interested in working together?
Get in Touch